Sprawled Out: The Search for Community in the American Suburb

Kudos to Summerfest: Anyone with any respect for our armed forces would realize that war is not a video game

.... And therefor, convincing kids that war is a video game is a slap in the face to anyone who serves or has served. Veterans for Peace should be congratulated for all that they do, including their role in having the Army's "virtual wargame" simulator at Summerfest altered to something much more sane. Note: The US Army's exhibit is right where it always was; all that was done was to change a war simulation game and end distribution of the game on DVDs.

The very notion that narcissistic radio-squawker chickenhawks would dare to comment disparagingly about the sensible efforts of people who actually served is comical. That they would lie - - Mark Belling's web site has the falicious headline "US Army Thrown Out of Summerfest" - - is typical. 

ABOVE: An elegant illustration of the talk radio mentality. "U.S. Army Thrown Out Of Summerfest"? Incorrect. So, it's either a LIE designed to inflame uninformed dittoheads or Belling got it wrong; par for the course in the intellectual backwaters of squawk radio, particularly at Milwaukee's WISN.

As we approach the 4th of July weekend and its observances, let's hope that more and more people use the opportunity to reflect and eventually see through the empty platitudes of these integrity-challenged, attention-starved hypocrites.

UPDATE: James Rowen notes that radio talker Charlie Sykes has felt free on the air to call those who objected to the virtual wargame "moonbats." Rowen further notes that Uppity Wisconsin blogger Bill Christofferson, who Sykes lambasted for publishing the Summerfest adminstrative phone number so people could register complaints against the war simulation game, served two tours during the Vietnam War as a US Marine.

Nice, Mr. Sykes.

Shoppes at Wyndham Village/Temple of Target scheduled to open. Anticipated asphalt temperature at ribbon cutting: 112 degrees

The temple of Target, originally uploaded by johnruexp.

I imagine we'll soon see a big gong installed on top of this monstrosity so the native inhabitants (some sort of parking lot cult) can summon King Kong.

We get what we deserve.

Ribbon cutting for the Shoppes is July 7th. Target opens on July 24. Whether human sacrifice is scheduled for either event has not yet been announced.

UPDATE: For a look at yet another local monstrosity proposed by a different developer, be sure to visit Metro Milwaukee Today.

They really have our number, don't they?

Oil Prices: Reality still hasn't descended upon mainstream media

Milwaukee isn't the only region in denial when it comes to the upcoming crisis. A confused nation waits for Dr. Phil to tell them how to feel:

All this reality content is beginning to penetrate the collective consciousness in the US, but the result is mostly panic or paralyzed disbelief rather than any set of intelligent responses. For example, I got a call from one of Katie Couric's producers at CBS news on Friday. Somehow, they had noticed that oil prices were becoming a problem in America. They called me for a comment. The scary part was they were clearly treating the issue as a "lifestyle" story. Did I think more suburbanites would move downtown? And would that be a good thing...?  They have no %$#ing clue how broadly and deeply these dynamics will affect the life of this nation, or even our ability to remain a nation. Also, by the way, this demonstrates how the nightly network news has become the equivalent of the old "women's pages" of the daily newspapers.

James Howard Kunstler, Cluster$%$ Nation

"The dismal failure of Milwaukee’s civic leaders to bring the region’s public transit infrastructure up to 21st-century standards is more than just another run-of-the-mill breakdown in leadership."

University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Professor Marc. V. Levine gets it right in his op-ed from this Sunday's Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.

Meanwhile, we have in County Executive Scott Walker a living example of willful obstinacy that is slowly and oh-so-surely killing Milwaukee and the surrounding region. This blind obstructionist is planning to proudly veto an advisory referendum on a (much-needed) 1-cent increase in the county sales tax! 

Read that again: Scott Walker is vetoing a vote in which the people decide - - in a nonbinding vote - -  whether it's worth a tax hike to fix the broken county.

He doesn't want to know how the citizens of his broken county feel about the current state of transit, parks, and other infrastructure?

Who does this sort of thing? A politician who is plotting a run for governor and who fears the likes of Mark Belling, that's who. Scott Walker is looking out for Scott Walker.

Once again, self-interest reigns, and Milwaukee's reputation as a non-starter that cowers under the clumsy brickbats of conservative radio talkers - - a cartoon-character breed that squeals in desperate search of attention and ratings and without regard to any larger truth - -  spreads across the nation as surely as this poorly formed, run-on sentence spreads across your screen.

It's time to ignore the talk-radio narcissists and pandering politicians and do what needs to be done. And if a County Executive fears an advisory vote by the people that may hinder his political future, his time is up.

Dim light at the end of the tunnel

The region needs higher wattage ideas for transit

By MARC V. LEVINE

The dismal failure of Milwaukee’s civic leaders to bring the region’s public transit infrastructure up to 21st-century standards is more than just another run-of-the-mill breakdown in leadership.

It is a public policy debacle that threatens the very economic viability of this city and region — and it comes at a time when we already are struggling with stagnant growth, spreading poverty and shockingly high rates of joblessness in the inner city.

Skyrocketing gas prices and awareness of climate change are reshaping the way Americans live, work and play. Mass transit ridership is surging in cities with rail transit systems, as commuters seek alternatives to $4.50-a-gallon gasoline. Suburban and exurban communities, whose growth was predicated on cars and cheap gas, are facing bursting housing bubbles and an uncertain future.

In this new era, the economic winners will be cities and regions that have invested in state-of-the-art mass transit. Unfortunately, few metropolitan areas are less prepared for these changes than Milwaukee.

Unlike in virtually all other large U.S. cities, leaders here have balked for two decades at building any form of regional rail transit.

By contrast, other cities, such as Baltimore, St. Louis and Minneapolis have built light rail systems since the 1990s (and ridership has soared by 15% this year in all three places). In 2004, Denver voters approved a $4.7 billion bond issue, underwritten by a sales tax, for a 119-mile expansion of their system, while Kansas City recently approved financing of a $1 billion, 27-mile light rail line.

Even in conservative, historically anti-tax “red states,” civic leaders and voters have understood the economic imperative of investing in rail transit. Salt Lake City recently raised the sales tax to expand regional rail. Phoenix is building a 20-mile, $1.3 billion light rail line. And in Texas, that bastion of big-government liberalism, Dallas is investing $4 billion to double the size of its regional light rail system to 90 miles.

In an era of expensive gas and pressures to reduce carbon footprints, it takes some magical thinking to believe that Milwaukee can remain economically competitive as one of the nation’s only large cities without such infrastructure.

The intransigence of Milwaukee County Executive Scott Walker, bolstered by know-nothing talk radio hosts, columnists and bloggers, is obviously the biggest impediment to sensible transit policy.

Fortunately, Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett supports rail transit. Unfortunately, he has offered an inadequate plan: a streetcar Downtown Circulator that would run in a three-mile loop around downtown, which is too small and too slow to generate either of the two key economic benefits of rail transit — linking workers to employment hubs in the region or promoting development along rail corridors.

Barrett sees the Circulator as a “starter” investment toward a more elaborate rail system, touting its links to the vastly oversold KRM commuter rail proposal. But it’s likely that the mayor’s trolley to nowhere would draw meager ridership, thus providing more ammunition to the opponents of light rail, foreclosing future investments and leaving us with an underutilized white elephant ringing downtown.

Barrett, properly concerned about fiscal responsibility, notes that “advocates have failed to explain how to fund a more extensive system.”

Yes, public finances are tight everywhere. Yet leaders in places as varied as Denver, Baltimore, Dallas, Minneapolis and Charlotte have financed the construction or expansion of their systems in recent years. Moreover, even in fiscally strapped Milwaukee, we’ve found a way to spend billions in the past decade on a baseball stadium and a convention center, mega-projects that nearly all economists agree contribute precious little to regional economic growth.

Surely, then, given the existential importance of transit for metro Milwaukee, a financially sensible, $1 billion regional fixed-rail plan can be crafted:

• Using the $91.5 million in federal funds already allocated.

• Minimizing capital costs by extensively utilizing existing rail rights of way.

• Creatively deploying such tools as tax incremental financing.

• Selling station-area development rights.

• Receiving infrastructure support from the State of Wisconsin.

• And, yes, implementing a regional sales tax (with rebates to low-income residents) to fund transit improvements and operations.

If Sen. Barack Obama is elected president, more federal funding likely will be available for rail transit. Obama’s campaign platform calls for a National Infrastructure Reinvestment Bank that could provide an infusion of funds to cities like Milwaukee to invest in transit (as well as in other infrastructure vital to economic development).

But the biggest problem is not fiscal but political.

Barrett and his allies should boldly confront the anti-rail demagogues, advocating a comprehensive fixed-rail plan for Milwaukee’s future that would link key hubs (downtown, the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, the County Grounds and the airport) and stretch from the North Shore suburbs through the central city, perhaps to Brookfield.

The region’s corporate leaders, represented by the Metropolitan Milwaukee Association of Commerce and the Greater Milwaukee Committee, supposedly support regional rail transit. If that’s true, they should make it the centerpiece of the Milwaukee 7 initiative, turning it into a more muscular regionalism that could underpin an economic revitalization of the city and region.

Rail is not a panacea for Milwaukee’s economic woes: It will not single-handedly solve the crisis of inner city joblessness, end poverty or create a culture of economic innovation here (although it will help in all of those areas).

But imagine a future of $8-a-gallon gas, in which Milwaukee is one of the few large cities in the United States without rail transit.

Businesses increasingly will locate in transit-friendly regions that offer the efficient and economical flow of people, goods and services. A Milwaukee without rail transit runs the risk of becoming economically obsolete, a city whose leaders failed to invest in its economic future.

Investing in rail is not like flipping a switch; the lead time is substantial. We already are way behind other cities, and our economic viability is slipping away.

The time for action is now.

Marc V. Levine is a professor of history, economic development and urban studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.

Franklin Plan Commission sandbagged

Signs that post-flood normalcy may be returning:

- On Tuesday I found time to go running (in the process discovering all kinds of brand new aches and pains that come from days of hauling wet pop culture debris from a flooded basement);

- Tonight I'm going to mow the lawn;

- And right now I'm going to bellyache about the decomposition of Franklin's Plan Commission.

Weeks ago, when it looked like Kevin Haley was being forced off the commission (he's since been reinstated for reasons still unclear), I'd put in an open records request for the volunteer sheets submitted by current members of that body. With Haley possibly off the commission, the point I wanted to make was that the remaining members had little in their backgrounds to engender confidence in their ability to safeguard the city's long-term goals and well-being against the ambitions of developers who look no further than their personal bottom line. As has been noted here before, commissioner Kevin Haley was the lone voice against some pretty blatant developer manipulations. No one else on the commission felt moved - - or indeed seemed qualified - - to support Haley's legitimate objections and informed observations.

Now comes news that the mayor has successfully placed former alderman Pete Kosovich on the Plan Commission. As reported by Greg Kowalski on his now-defunct FranklinNow.com blog (continued at his new blog, Metro Milwaukee Today), Kosovich squeaked in when the mayor broke a 3-3 common council tie. The tally, which I'm pasting from Greg Kowalski's blog (with my comments in parenthesis), was:

Olson: NO (Very interesting, and should have set the tone)

Solomon: YES

Wilhelm: NO (Expected)

Taylor: YES (I'll assume Taylor felt he needed to be magnanimous after defeating Kosovich)

Sohns: NO

Skowronski: YES

Mayor Taylor YES (tie-breaker)

With all due respect to the mayor and Mr. Kosovich: What th'...?!?!

Is the standard for serving on the Plan Commission of one of the fastest growing suburbs in Wisconsin really nothing more than a desire to serve and, as blogger Kevin Fischer explains in his blog entry supporting Kosovich's nomination, a presumed "knowledge of local ordinances, state rules and regulations, and ... experience in dealing with Franklin business and economic development issues"?

The answer more likely resides hidden in the cynical language of a comment Fischer left after his entry:

Appointment of friends, colleagues, etc has been going on in politics for all time. This is nothing new.*

Jim Doyle has appointed tons of people that have been confirmed by the state Senate when it was controlled by Republicans and now Democrats.

Taylor appointed Kosovich because he knows him, likes him, respects him, is familiar with him and thinks he will do a good job.

But you know what else? There are certain developers in town who likely thought they'd been rid of their only obstacle on the plan commission, Kevin Haley. When the mayor inexplicably reversed himself and brought Haley back on to the commission, a "gesture" had to be made.

Enter Pete Kosovich, plan commissioner.

Don't get me wrong; it appears to me that Mr. Kosovich is a nice enough gentleman and should be commended for his desire to serve, but, verily, I doubt that intricate land planning and development theories regularly weigh heavily upon his mind. Will we find on his bookshelves dog-eared, yellow-highlighted volumes like Zoned Out: Regulation, Markets, and Choices in Transportation and Metropolitan Land Use, A Better Place to Live: Reshaping the American Suburb, the harrowing Edge City: Life on the New Frontier, Community and the Politics of Place, The Geography of Nowhere, How Cities Work, Suburban Nation, the pro-sprawl Sprawl: A Compact History, the required-reading Crabgrass Frontier: The Suburbanization of the United States, Regulating Place: Standards and the Shaping of Urban America, Cities of Tomorrow: An Intellectual History of Urban Planning and Design in the Twentieth Century, Land Use Planning and Development Regulation Law, and the noxious but still informative in a "know the enemy" sort of way, The Best-Laid Plans: How Government Planning Harms Your Quality of Life, Your Pocketbook, and Your Future?

(I must confess, I don't own the above books either: My dog-eared, yellow-highlighted volumes of these tomes washed away when my office was flooded last week.)

No, Mr. Kosovich will rely on his "knowledge of local ordinances, state rules and regulations, and ... experience in dealing with Franklin business and economic development issues."

Just the sort of bootstrap knowledge you need when a developer is trying to sneak in another self-enriching, city-draining strip-mall, huh?

Notwithstanding Mr. Kosovich's admirable desire to serve, this was a bad, old school pol move that will have potentially devastating consequences down the line unless something is done very soon to fix a sandbagged plan commission.

* [Note - I was a fly on the wall (harmless intern) during Tommy Thompson's reign in Madison. Those guys might not have invented cronyism, but they certainly perfected it. What a pit of incestuous vipers. It led to my first (and so far, last) legal deposition, as part of a sexual harassment claim against a Thompson good-old-boy appointee.]

Oak Creek boots Boomgaard; Franklin remains quiet

Will they get their money by from Zizzo Group? Don't hold your breath.

Would this name have been deflected without blogger pressure?

From FranklinNow.com:

The South 27th Street Steering Committee will likely have to come up with a new name for the 27th Street Corridor after its first choice -- the "Boomgaard District" -- was ridiculed by bloggers, radio talk show hosts, columnists and many residents.

The Oak Creek Common Council last night unanimously approved a motion referring the name back to the committee, with a recommendation to consider selecting a new name.

The formal action follows a consensus reached last month by Oak Creek and Franklin officials that the name should be re-evaluated by the committee. The committee decided that it would wait at least 120 days before making a final decision on a name.

Is Ed McMahon the Rock Hudson of the mortgage lending crisis?

Bear with me.

Remember when AIDS was considered by the high-minded to be some sort of punishment from on high sent to punish libidinous homosexuals for their morality-flouting lifestyles?

It wasn't just southern evangelists. Ronald Reagan's communications director, Pat Buchanan, stated that AIDS is "nature's revenge on gay men." Reagan's response to the growing epidemic was anemic at best. It was a problem confined to "others," people outside of his conception of reality (he fought World War II on a soundstage, remember).

The message was clear whne it came to AIDS: Fund programs for prevention, education, treatment and a cure? Why should we upstanding heterosexuals pay for the profligate lifestyles of morally bankrupt homosexuals - - i.e. bad people?

Because, you see, only bad people got AIDS.

How deep did the notion pervade the Reagan administration? From an article called Reagan's AIDS Legacy: Silence Equals Death:

Dr. C. Everett Koop, Reagan's surgeon general, has said that because of "intradepartmental politics" he was cut out of all AIDS discussions for the first five years of the Reagan administration. The reason, he explained, was "because transmission of AIDS was understood to be primarily in the homosexual population and in those who abused intravenous drugs." The president's advisers, Koop said, "took the stand, 'They are only getting what they justly deserve.' "

Not even a medical problem, they thought.

Things changed on July 25, 1985, when the American Hospital in Paris announced that Rock Hudson, a mainstream star in the Reagans' circle of acquaintance - - high profile good people! - -  had AIDS. Though Reagan and his administration remained resolutely silent on the epidemic (he finally publicly addressed AIDS in 1987, near the end of his second term), mainstream Hollywood rallied around the cause all the more fervently, campaigning for government funding and intervention. 

Because, you see, good people get AIDS. "Gosh, this could happen to anyone!" the people in Ron and Nancy's circle began to say to themselves.

If this could happen to Rock Hudson ...

Compare the pre-Rock Hudson attitude of righteous conservatives toward AIDS with local right wing columnist Patrick McIlheran's cold condescension toward those unlucky enough to be swept up in the mortgage lending crisis wave. He quotes an "angry renter":

"It just seems so wrong that these people made a wrong decision," she said, "and now they're crying for help and they seem to be getting it."

McIlheran himself lectures further:

Rage as you will about liars' loans and bankers' bonuses, what's still more outrageous is when we make it official public policy to punish the prudent and to help the profligate. It's grim that some people could lose their houses and have to rent for a while. It would be far worse if Big Mama Government swooped in to undo their mistake - with money taken from people who wanted to stop renting and never got the chance.

In this case the federal government has decided to take action; foreclosures are occurring at record levels, and, frankly, the banks are the main beneficiaries of the bail-out (it pays to have friends in high places). If some actual American citizens see a bit of relief, so much the better.

But, McIlheran sputters, why should we upstanding homeowners pay for the profligate habits of all those bad people? Because, you see, only bad people get into mortgage trouble. Only bad people can be taken in by fast-talking loan representatives who profit enormously from ridiculous mortgages. Only bad people experience bad breaks. McIlheran apparently can no more muster compassion for these deadbeats than Pat Buchanan could for the promiscuous, hedonistic queens he saw in his mind's eye when contemplating the scourge of AIDS.

We now learn that Ed McMahon - - by all accounts a sensible, good person with money and lawyers and powerful pals! - - is facing foreclosure on his mansion.

From CNN:

King: And the payments, you can't make -- what's the problem?

Ed McMahon: Well, if you spend more money than you make, you know what happens. And it can happen. You know, a couple of divorces thrown in, a few things like that. And, you know, things happen. You want everything to be perfect, but that combination of the economy, I have a little injury, I have a situation. And it all came together.

Anyone even vaguely acquainted with pop culture of the past half-century is aware of McMahon's countless hosting and spokesman gigs. The guy was always working, tireless - - and don't forget his profit and syndication participation in shows like Star Search and TV Bloopers And Practical Jokes (on NBC from 1982 until 1998!). I'm fairly certain he never has to pay for his Budweiser, either.

And yet, it is happening to him - - a man with armies of agents and lawyers watching over him. He's not a guy known for tossing around money or being particularly "profligate." He's known as one of the "good eggs" in Hollywood. But, nonetheless, misfortune swooped on him (a broken neck, a bad real estate market, etc.) and now he faces a crisis.

Sure - you can see gold-encrusted Evander Holyfield getting into money trouble - that fits the McIlheran "you had it coming" profile. And the McMansion-lusting young couples who jumped from dorms to five-acre cul-de-sacs via mom and dad loans and made-up income numbers - - I admit to feeling they cooked their own goose.

But Ed McMahon? There he is on Larry King saying, "You know, things happen"! He's a veteran of two wars!

Gosh, this could happen to anyone!

So, what about non-celebrity people who are equally "good eggs," not particular greedy (though McIlheran preaches incessantly that greed and wastefulness are our God-given rights as Americans), and didn't/don't have that army of lawyers and agents nearby to check the paperwork for them? What about the ones that didn't "over-buy," but just bought a modest house for their family while trusting their mortgage broker?

Remember that paperwork when you bought your house? Remember the whole afternoon of signing and initialing? Did you have a lawyer present? You don't think they could have slipped one by you during that process?

Think again. One does not have to be "profligate" to be victimized. There are solid, coupon-clipping, flag-waving citizens out there who are in a deep hole because they took bad advice.

And to the "Angry Renters" quoted in McIlheran's piece: Rather than wallow in smug self-involvement and blame the victims, count your lucky stars (as I do; I bought my house before the boom and have a "sane" fixed mortgage). You dodged a bullet - the slightest shift in circumstances and you would have been in a chair at CountryWide Mortgage with a grinning rep hovering over you, paperwork in hand, American Dream in sight. "Only a fool would pass up this deal in this market. Are you going to be a fool?"

Because if it can happen to Ed McMahon ...

RELATED: The mortgage lending crisis explained

Has Fountains of Franklin peed on local blogger's lawn?

ABOVE: A recent picture of the Fountains of Franklin site. Or an old one - - it doesn't really matter, as nothing has changed.

How does one begin to dissect the folly of the latest manifestation of Republican senate aide Kevin Fischer’s fixation with the baby-step progress of Fountains of Franklin?

True - nothing is going on over there. I've had a little fun at Fountains' expense as well; there's no great glory in tagging a slow-moving beast, however. But Mr. Fischer seems deeply, personally offended by the lack of earth-moving equipment on the site. He is asking the city of Franklin for no less than “an analysis of the monthly lost tax revenue to the city of Franklin caused by the continued dormant site at 56th and Rawson. How much tax revenue is it costing the city of Franklin each and every month that site fails to operate with open businesses?”

He equates this request, you see, with the conjecture that Alderman Sohns' disastrous grandstand play wherein he displayed property values and taxes for Franklin bloggers was prepared by a city employee. Therefor, thinks Mr. Fischer, this same employee can run some numbers for him as well.

This is not a matter of retrieving numbers from a database, however. Evidently Mr. Fischer imagines an Excel spreadsheet sort of thing that the city of Franklin can fire up on their Dell computers (because I just know they don’t have Macs at city hall) and spit out a neat and tidy number that somehow perfectly conjectures not only what kind of businesses would be operating in Fountains of Franklin, but exactly how much revenue they are taking in per month: “By gar - - that idle land is costing us $7,267.54 per day, and $7,976.21 on double-coupon days! Let’s get a Walgreens planted, stat!”

The answer, perhaps, is an evening's session on the computer game SimCity. Punch in some data, do some terraforming, get rid of pesky plan commission input and UDI nonsense, add permanent tax cuts - DONE. Here's what Fountains of Franklin should look like in, say, 2010:

Will you just LOOK at the tax revenue we're losing as Fountains stands idle! No wonder Mr. Fischer is typing with such righteous ferver and purpose! Compare to the "before" photo:

Thank goodness for Mr. Fischer's vigilance, born as it is out nothing more than a pure and overwhelming concern for his community.

(Pause as laughter subsides....)

Fortunately, since "just a concerned citizen" Mr. Fischer has begrudgingly emerged from stealth mode (we are now told in his blog bio - - though not in print - - that he is an employee of state senator Mary Lazich, but only after I admonished the concealment) readers can fairly easily supply context. His employer has received (and undoubtedly hopes to continue to receive) financial contributions from Mark Carstensen, the developer of the troubled, no-announced-tenants Target-Shoppes at Wyndham Village (that's the one I fixate on, but I wear my bias on my sleeve), which is a direct competitor of what is planned for Fountains of Franklin. Nothing wrong with that, but smart businessmen don't lay out dough without expecting results. For her part, Senator Lazich has delivered, writing in support of Carstensen’s development sight unseen. She's a little inaccurate, however, in her effusive 1/6/07 letter to Secretary Frank Bussalacchi of the Wisconsin Department of Transportation:

I am pleased to add my support for the project to the unanimous support off [sic] the City of Franklin Plan Commission and Common Council.

Not unanimous. Plan Commissioner Kevin Haley voted against the development's crummy site plan - - hence, I submit, his momentary (more on that later) ouster from the commission.

So, bad for Fountains of Franklin is good for Carstensen and Shoppes at Wyndham Village. You don't think he'd like the tenants that are talking to Fountains to reconsider and come over to the currently Shoppes-less Shoppes at Wyndham Village? (How's this for a sales pitch: "Hey, Azana Spa - wouldn't you love to be located in the Target parking lot? it's, uh, really warm in the Summer!")

So, here's an idea: Plant seeds of doubt in the competing development. The only question is: Do Mr. Fischer’s marching orders come via fax, email, or over the phone? Bluetooth receiver in his ear? Bike messenger?

On the other side of the "methinks he protests too much" continuum is Fountains of Franklin's de facto champion, Greg Kowalski. His reaction to Mr. Fischer's post is virtually a Fountains press release. Having met with Fountains developer Dave Hintzman and apparently made privy to some Top Secret Information, Mr. Kowalski appears to have embraced the project and takes criticism of it somewhat personally. 

Who said municipal planning has to be dull?

Souvenir picture from the soon-to-be-nostalgic days of "happy motoring"

I had a feeling while pumping gas this past week that I was passing a landmark. Sub-$4 gas for the last time; right down the road it was already $4.23 a gallon.

County Exec Scott Walker? Asleep at the wheel.

Here comes a capital "c" Crisis because Wisconsin is simply unprepared to cope with the approaching new reality - - we're talking about re-goldplating the Zoo Interchange, for heaven's sake. Meanwhile, Chicago, Racine, Milwaukee and Madison still exist as commercial centers "connected" by nothing more than asphalt when there should be trains - yes, expensive trains! -  running continuously between those points.

Still think $10 a gallon can't happen? Perhaps before the summer is out....

Will we see an exodus from far-flung suburbs as commuters tally their weekly gas bill? I already hear from people who are looking at changing either their work or home situations based on expensive car commutes. Combine this with the downward housing spiral; are a rash of abandoned subdivisions - old and new - ahead?

The days of "happy motoring" may be over.

Some people have a pretty good crystal ball. James Howard Kunstler, author of The Geography of Nowhere, wrote this last October:

Most American towns, including my own, are obsessed to the point of mania with the issue of parking and more generally the management of cars, and much of their spending is directed to those ends. Municipal leaders (and the public they serve) have no idea what kind of problems the nation faces with oil. Because life in the USA has worked a particular way all their lives, they assume that it will continue to operate that way. Not only will they be disappointed as happy motoring spirals into history, but they will create a lot mischief in the meantime in planning things based on faulty assumptions.

My own town, for instance, relies heavily on tourism, in particular tourism based on happy motoring. There is not the slightest apprehension among the people here, or our leaders in city hall, that automobile-based tourism may not be happening as soon as five years from now. All our political energy is being expended in fighting about what kind of parking structures we will build (with borrowed money) and where to put them, and how these things might incorporate some secondary uses, such as police offices. We have also been debating plans for the expansion of our modest convention center -- in connection with added parking structures. It seems to me that one of the first things to go as the US economy contracts, along with its energy supply, will be activities like boat shows and optometrist's conventions.

Now this town happens to be on a railroad line that connects New York City to Montreal. Before 1950, it was the main way that people came to this town. These days, we get one train a day in each direction. The trains are invariably late, and not just a little late, but hours late. The track bed is in miserable shape and, of course, Amtrak is a sort of soviet-style management organization. There is no awareness among the public here, or our leaders, that we would benefit from improving the passenger railroad service, and around the state of New York generally there is no conversation about fixing the railroads. (Governor Elliot Spitzer is preoccupied these days with arranging to give driver's licenses to people who are in the country illegally.) We are going to pay a large penalty for these failures of attention.

Another aspect of all this has to do with our assumptions about land development. Here in my town, and elsewhere around the country, the assumption is that suburban development will continue just as it has the past sixty years. This assumption is shared both by the developers themselves and their opponents. The developers expect the current "downturn" to reverse before long. From the opponents' point of view, the assumption is based on their legitimate fears and heartaches about what they've seen heedless development do to the American landscape. Consequently, whatever mental energy is left after the parking debates get tabled is dedicated to fighting over projected suburban expansion.

My personal view about this is apparently radical -- though I am a man of modest habits and philosophy. My view is that the suburban project, per se, in the United States is over, finished. Like, totally. You can stick a fork in it. What you see is basically all that we're going to get. Not only do we not need anymore of it, but we have way too much of what is already on the ground. We don't need anymore suburban housing pods, and the ones already out there are going to hemorrhage value (and usefulness) as far ahead as anybody can imagine. We need more retail like we need 300-million holes in our heads. Ditto suburban office capacity. Ditto new roads and highways.

Franklin Alderman's clumsy attempt to intimidate bloggers

It used to be so much simpler to be an alderman in the days before bloggers started coming to meetings and proliferating to the masses just what was going on in municipal government.

Franklin Alderman Lyle Sohns (district 5) stepped in it this past Tuesday when he decided to put local bloggers on notice by distributing a document/spreadsheet showing property values and taxes for a cross-section of Franklin residents.

He thought it would be a keen idea to personalize the issue for those bloggers who complain incessently about high property taxes (I am not one of them) by having someone - at taxpayer expense? - look up the home values and property tax history of each blogger. I've posted a portion of the document to the right, omitting the detailed property value and tax information.

Get the message?

Granted, this is all publicly available information and no names were used, but Sohns attempts to make his point by none-too-subtly serving notice to local bloggers that he is willing to, at the very least, make them uncomfortable.

And there is the legitimate question of "what's next?" Photos of bloggers' homes showing improper lawn care when making a point about beautification efforts? Screen shots of Wisconsin Circuit Court Online to reveal the speeding ticket I got in Wausau 12 years ago? (Note to curious searchers: I share my name with a much older scofflow who was born in 1948.)

Welcome to the New Day, Alderman Sohns. And say goodbye to rubber stamp re-election, because now you've made Fred Keller angry.

UPDATE: Blogger Janet Evans transcribed the portion of the Council Meeting wherein Sohns presented his spreadsheets.