« July 2010 | Main | September 2010 »
From Planetizen:
A few days ago, I was in a Chicago neighborhood called Lincoln Square, on Lincoln Avenue just south of Lawrence Avenue. Lincoln Avenue looks like many posh urban neighborhoods- narrow, walkable streets inhabited by gelato-eating, prosperous-looking people. Even on a weeknight, the shops and streets of Lincoln Square betrayed no evidence of a recession.*
Lincoln intersects with Lawrence Avenue just a block from the core of Lincoln Square. Lawrence Avenue resembles a suburb more than it resembles Lincoln Square; it is six lanes wide (though unlike in most suburbs, two of them are used for parking), and some shops are behind parking lots. But Lawrence's retail is far less prosperous than that of Lincoln; a good number of Lawrence's storefronts seemed to be vacant, and others were occupied by dollar stores and other non-carriage trade businesses.**
Both Lincoln Avenue and Lawrence Avenue have the same housing stock and thus the same neighbors, the same city government (and thus the same tax rates and school districts) and the same distance from downtown (about seven miles). Thus, these two intersecting streets constitute the perfect controlled experiment on the popularity of walkable urbanism. If people basically liked shopping on car-oriented speedways, Lawrence would have fewer vacant storefronts than Lincoln. Yet the opposite is true. It follows that where everything else is equal, shoppers prefer walkable urbanism to car-oriented suburbanism.
At this point, readers may be asking themselves: why, then, do some suburbs continue to prosper? Because not everything else is equal: an unwalkable suburb may be further away from troubled neighborhoods (usually leading to more prestigous schools and less crime), in a less poverty-packed jurisdiction (thus leading to lower taxes), or have a newer housing stock. Thus, not every suburb will look as scruffy as Lincoln Square.
But the tale of these two adjacent streets nevertheless tells us something: that city life with walkability is appealing to American consumers, while city life with less walkability is anything but.
*For a few pictures of Lincoln Square, see
http://atlantaphotos.fotopic.net/p66205703.html
http://atlantaphotos.fotopic.net/p66205709.html
http://atlantaphotos.fotopic.net/p66205702.html
**Although I took no pictures of Lawrence, you can see the street by going to the 2200-2600 blocks of West Lawrence Avenue on Google Street View.
Michael Lewyn is an assistant professor at Florida Coastal School of Law in Jacksonville, FL, where he teaches a seminar on sprawl and the law (as well as numerous other courses).
Read the rest at: More evidence that walkability is marketable | Planetizen
Survey says 60% of home builders shifting to pedestrian-oriented, mixed-use neighborhoods
A message to my local officials and planners: Is this evidence enough for you to enact -- and PROMOTE -- Smart Growth and Smartcode principles sooner rather than later?
Read the rest at: Citybizlist Baltimore - Business Survey Gauges Real Estate Market in Tri-State, Mid-Atlantic
Posted at 09:07 AM in Bicycling and Walking, Commentary, Current Affairs, Mayoral Ad-Hoc Development Process Review Committee, Politics, Retail design, Safe Routes to School, Traditional Neighborhood Development, Traffic/Transportation | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
| Reblog (0)