Ten reasons opposition to the House transportation bill is growing
- Ends three decades of dedicated federal funding for public transportation.
- Cuts overall transportation funding for nearly every state and relies on risky and speculative funding sources.
- Takes away local control, planning authority and resources.
- Ends the “Safe Routes to School” program and other dedicated funding to make streets safer for walking and bicycling.
- Eliminates the bridge repair program and offloads responsibility for thousands of deficient bridges to local governments.
- Allows transportation money in a pollution-control fund to be used on new roadways for solo drivers.
- Requires more bureaucracy at transit agencies.
- Bets big on little-known “State Infrastructure Banks.”
- Undermines basic safeguards to protect human health and the environment, and to give citizens a voice in the project review process.
- Abandons any true “national” interest in transportation.
Read the rest at: Transportation For America » The more they see, the less they like: 10 reasons why opposition to the House transportation bill is growing
Franklin council delays action on Meijer proposal - JSOnline
Above: A Meijer community meeting in Franklin.
Here's an article that oversimplifies a more complex issue. As a member of Franklin's Economic Development Committee and Plan Commission, I can tell you that there are, actually, myriad issues that have NOT been dealt with relating to DNR permits (Meijer subverted the process a bit when they went to a DNR pre-plan meeting with a full plan) and the DOT's fairly tone-deaf road requirements. Homeowners who live nearby are in for quite a change.
Meijer has proposed a take-it-or-leave-it 24-hour big box with an ocean of new impervious surface. The DNR requires that a site plan be submitted that does not impinge upon the floodways and wetlands to the extent that the current plan does; Meijer is then charged with proving that the improved site plan is impossible.
Meijer has not submitted that plan or its reasons for not creating a more location-sensitive site plan; the DNR has made it clear that the burden of proof resides with Meijer. The Franklin Plan Commission voted on the site plan and other accommodations for Meijer WITHOUT access to the alternate site plan (I was the lone "no" vote on the Commission).
Communities get the development they deserve. Big box stores of this size demand a large market share and will drain that market share from surrounding businesses (the Franklin Pick and Save Center on 76th Street is already for sale; they know which way the wind blows). A store like Meijer is certainly welcome, but they should develop the property with sensitivity to the community, surrounding neighborhoods, and local long-term economy. The answer is there, but Meijer has not presented any alternatives.
Read the rest at: Franklin council delays action on Meijer proposal - JSOnline
Posted at 09:25 AM in Bad news, Buy Local, Close to Home, Commentary, Community Concepts, Current Affairs, Economic Development Commission, Franklin Photos, Plan Commission, Politics, Problems, Retail design, Traffic/Transportation, Transparency | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)
| Reblog (0)